Poetry Friday: Poem #36, To a Waterfowl by William Cullen Bryant, 1818

“The fact that poetry is not of the slightest economic or political importance, that it has no attachment to any of the powers that control the modern world, may set it free to do the only thing that in this age it can do —to keep the neglected parts of the human experience alive until the weather changes; as in some unforeseeable way it may do”~Graham Hough

Last year I did a poem survey and began posting the top 100 poems from the survey in chronological order. Then life and laziness and Cybils and Christmas intervened, and I only posted the oldest 35 of the 100 projected poems. But I am determined to use Poetry Friday as an excuse to write about the other 65 poems on list. So, today I’m back with an American poet, William Cullen Bryant.

Unidentified Waterfowl 3photo © 2010 Richard Hawley | more info (via: Wylio)
Whither, ‘midst falling dew,
While glow the heavens with the last steps of day,
Far, through their rosy depths, dost thou pursue
Thy solitary way?

Vainly the fowler’s eye
Might mark thy distant flight to do thee wrong,
As, darkly painted on the crimson sky,
Thy figure floats along.

Seek’st thou the plashy brink
Of weedy lake, or marge of river wide,
Or where the rocking billows rise and sink
On the chafed ocean side?

There is a Power whose care
Teaches thy way along that pathless coast,–
The desert and illimitable air,–
Lone wandering, but not lost.

All day thy wings have fann’d
At that far height, the cold thin atmosphere:
Yet stoop not, weary, to the welcome land,
Though the dark night is near.

And soon that toil shall end,
Soon shalt thou find a summer home, and rest,
And scream among thy fellows; reeds shall bend
Soon o’er thy sheltered nest.

Thou’rt gone, the abyss of heaven
Hath swallowed up thy form; yet, on my heart
Deeply hath sunk the lesson thou hast given,
And shall not soon depart.

He, who, from zone to zone,
Guides through the boundless sky thy certain flight,
In the long way that I must tread alone,
Will lead my steps aright.

William Cullen Bryant published his first poem at age ten. As an adult, he was a lawyer, and then a journalist and assistant editor of the New York Evening Post, a Federalist, later Republican-leaning, newspaper. Bryant was an ardent abolitionist whose major disagreement with Abraham Lincoln after Lincoln’s election was over the emancipation of the slaves and the abolition of slavery in the entire country. Bryant believed that Lincoln’s delay in freeing the slaves was incomprehensible and dilatory.

About Wm. Cullen Bryant:
Critic Thomas Holley Chivers: [The] “only thing [Bryant] ever wrote that may be called Poetry is ‘Thanatopsis’, which he stole line for line from the Spanish. The fact is, that he never did anything but steal—as nothing he ever wrote is original.”
Edgar Allan Poe on the poem “June”: “The rhythmical flow, here, is even voluptuous—nothing could be more melodious. The intense melancholy which seems to well up, perforce, to the surface of all the poet’s cheerful sayings about his grave, we find thrilling us to the soul—while there is the truest poetic elevation in the thrill… the impression left is one of a pleasurable sadness.”
Mary Mapes Dodge: “You will admire more and more, as you grow older, the noble poems of this great and good man.
Abraham Lincoln: “It is worth a visit from Springfield, Illinois, to New York to make the acquaintance of such a man as William Cullen Bryant.”

Poetry Friday is hosted today at A Teaching Life.

You Are What You See: Watching Movies Through a Christian Lens by Scott Nehring

The author begins this book about the Christian’s attitude toward movies with his conversion as an adult to the truth of Christianity and his life-changing encounter with near-death as he experienced a heart attack in the lobby of his bank. Mr. Nehring then shares that he is and has always been a film geek. Great introduction.

Then, in what is called “Section 1” of the book, we get almost 100 pages of what’s wrong with Hollywood. This first section of the book felt repetitive to me and can be summarized in this quote taken from chapter 8:

“Though many filmmakers may not recognize this desire for God, they know how to take advantage of it. The creation of figureheads, heroes, and celebrities is central to everything they produce. These products, in turn, attempt to fill our need for the Lord’s guidance. . . . When people remove God from their lives, they must replace Him with something. Just as generations have done for eons, we replaced Him with ourselves. It is not too late for us to learn from those previous generations that this is a bad idea.
We may try to remove God from our lives, but that does not mean we will not miss Him. What distracts us from God can never replace Him.”

True stuff, and Mr. Nehring is repeating a message that our culture needs to hear and that I need to be reminded of. Nevertheless, Section 2 of this book, entitled “The Structure of Film: Seeing What’s Right in Front of You,” was the part that I most enjoyed.

Each story begins with a Central Question—Will the boy get the girl? Can the hero learn to forgive? Can you fight city hall? The hero struggles through various trials on his way to learning the moral of the story—and in that ending we see the Answer to the Central Question.

This section continues by giving the reader an introduction to plot development, story arc or structure, heroes, villains, and other archetypes. This exposition of how characters and plot work together to produce a good story, either in print or on film, is the meat of the book. Even though I’ve seen some of this material before in other places (books about writing), Mr. Nehring brings a coherent voice and style to his explanations, and he also includes a wealth of examples from all the movies he has seen and analyzed. The author says that after reading this section of the book you will never watch movies in the same way again; you will see where the story is going and often be able to predict what will happen next and why. You will be intrigued by the choices the screenplay writer and the director made, and a bad movie or story will be seen as bad for a reason: it doesn’t follow the unconscious “rules” that we expect to see in a satisfying work of fiction.

I agree with Mr. Nehring’s prediction. I have been watching movies and reading in a different way since I read this book. I want to go back and review Section 2, though, because I am not as skilled as I would like to be at picking central questions (or themes), following the protagonist’s rise and fall and subsequent “resurrection,” and discerning the other character archetypes and heroic traits in any given narrative. This book is a reference tool that critics and literary and film “geeks” can use to understand the structure and meaning of the stories we are consuming. It would also be a useful source for aspiring writers of fiction, whether they be screenwriters, playwrights, short story writers, or novelists.

Section 3 of the book gives guidelines and suggestions, not rules, for Christians who want to watch movies intelligently and and grow in their discernment about which movies to watch and how to watch those that we do choose to view. Finally, Mr. Nehring’s thesis is that “movies matter. Movies impact your life every day, even if you never watch one.” If this statement is true, and I believe it is, then it behooves us as Christians living in this day and time to learn what we can about the impact of our cultural icons (movies) on us and on those around us. And since we are further commanded to be salt and light in a fallen world, You Are What You See is a good resource for Christians becoming that salt and light in the area of cinematic culture.

Scott Nehring is a film critic whose reviews have been syndicated on Reuters, USAToday, Fox News, and The Chicago Sun-TImes websites. Mr. Nehring’s reviews are available at www.GoodNewsFilmReviews.com.

What We’re Reading: Mid-January Report

Z-Baby (9):
Clementine, Friend of the Week by Sara Pennypacker. Semicolon review here.
Also various picture books, such as Corduroy by Don Freeman, Gregory, the Terrible Eater by Mitchell Sharmat and others.
Listening to: The Calder Game by Blue Balliett.
Read aloud book: The Silver Chair by C.S. Lewis.

Betsy-Bee (11):
For school: The Great Railroad Race by Kristiana Gregory, Make Way for Sam Houston by Jean Fritz.

Karate Kid (13):
For school: Dragon’s Gate by Laurence Yep.
Garfield cartoon books for fun.

Brown Bear Daughter (16):
For school: Dante’s Inferno, House of Mirth by Edith Wharton. (No, ther’s no relationship between the two selections as far as I know. She just has to read them both.)
Leisure reading: Heist Society by Ally Carter. She also dips into various Harry Potter books that she’s already read several times while she eats supper or lunch or snack or . . .

Drama Daughter (19): Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins.

Artiste Dughter (21): Neither Five Nor Three by Helen MacInnes, A Circle of Quiet by Madeleine L’Engle.

Computer Guru Son (23): Consider Phlebas by Ian M. Banks.

Eldest Daughter (25): God Is Near Us: The Eucharist, the Heart of Life by Pope Benedict XVI.

Engineer Husband and Father: The God Who Is There by D.A. Carson, Desiring God by John Piper.

Me: The books I’ve recently finished are mostly already reviewed here. My books-in-progress include The Eye of the Elephant: An Epic Adventure in the African Wilderness by Delia and Mark Owens, The Forsyte Saga by John Galsworthy, Churchill’s Secret Agent by Max and Linda Ciampoli, and Island of the World by Michael D. O’Brien. Yes, I am reading all of those books at the same time.

We’re a fairly eclectic family, wouldn’t you say?

The Identity Man by Andrew Klavan

I went back and forth about reviewing this one. It really has more sexual content and general nastiness than I’m usually comfortable with reading or recommending. The entire world of this novel is corrupt and festering with only a few islands of goodness or even normality, and those are under siege. This story gives “mean streets” a whole new level of meaning. On the other hand, Mr. Klavan has written a book that examines assumptions about redemption and getting a “new start” while at the same time entertaining and intriguing readers who just want to read to see what will happen next and find a solution to the mystery/suspense plotlines.

John Shannon is a petty thief who’s gotten in way over his head. He’s being accused of a heinous murder he didn’t commit, and he already has two strikes (convictions) against him; he’s headed for three strikes and you’re out for life in prison. Then, an anonymous phone caller throws him a lifeline: he can get a new identity. Are there strings attached? Can Shannon really become a new person? Is the mantra that his Identity Man, the man who provides the cosmetic surgery and the papers to give Shannon a second chance, repeats true? “Identity is like stain. You are not changed. You cannot change.”

It’s a basic question. Can a person really change? Can the stains of our sins and mistakes and even crimes really be washed away by positive thinking or a move to a new city or even by the blood of the Lamb? Some people say, “No way.” Nothing ever changes. Everything remains the same. You are what you are till the day that you die. The Identity Man demonstrates an avenue toward change, but it’s the same one our culture has been depending on for the past seventy years of Hollywood happy endings: a man can change by finding and claiming the love of a good woman. In fact, the idea that this particular change agent idea comes from Hollywood is implicit in the book. Shannon finds himself near the beginning of the story watching day after day of old black and white movies in which he finds a meta-narrative that he wishes he were able to emulate. The woman-saves-man solution, however, begs the question: how does the woman become a good woman? Are women innately good? And, if so, do those good women really have the power to drag the men into the realm of goodness and light?

The love of a good woman can’t ultimately save a man anymore than a heroic man can protect his woman from all harm, although both of those scenarios are played out in The Identity Man. Still, those myths have some powerful truth contained within them. True, selfless love can enable the beloved to turn toward change. And heroes, by the grace of God, do protect and defend those they love, even at the cost of their own lives. Nevertheless, real, lasting change in the life of a poor and needy sinner comes only by means of the miraculous. Change happens when God steps in.

We’re all desperate for change, for a new identity. “If any man be in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away. Behold, all things are become new.”

It’s a Story, Folks, Not a How-to Manual

In the front of my paperback copy of Snipp, Snapp, Snurr Learn to Swim by Maj Lindman, Brown Bear Daughter found the following disclaimer:

“A note to grownups: In this story, the characters are not wearing personal flotation devices or practicing some of the other water safety measures we now consider essential. While reading this book with children, you may want to use the story as a springboard to discuss safety around water and boats.”

O.K. Or you could just read the story, first published in the U.S. in 1954, and enjoy the old-fashioned Scandinavian setting and the self-reliant triplets and the lovely illustrations. Nanny does try to ensure the boys’ safety in the water —by having them learn to swim!

Ship Breaker by Paolo Bacigalupi

Ship Breaker is on the shortlist for the Cybils YA Fantasy/Science Fiction Award.

Ship Breaker was a finalist for 2010 National Book Award in the category of Young People’s Literature. (The winner was Mockingbird by Katherine Erskine.)

Ship Breaker won the 2011 Printz Award for Excellence in Young Adult Literature.

And, having just finished reading this award-winning piece of dystopian fiction, I would say it deserves the nominations and awards and accolades it’s recieved. I would also say that the PC setting and themes in the book didn’t hurt its chances in the running for awards. The world in Ship Breaker is a world destroyed and reconfigured by climate change and the greed of oil hungry corporations and industries. By the time the story opens, oil is an extremely scarce commodity, and the world’s transportation systems run on other forms of energy, for the most part. Our hero, Nailer, is one of the lowest of the low in the New World Order, a scavenger who works the light crew on wrecked oil tankers and other useless hulks washed up on the beach where Nailer lives. The best Nailer can hope for is a place on another crew when he outgrows his ability to crawl into the small spaces where copper wiring and other “scavenge” can be found on the wrecked ships. Nailer’s mother is dead, and his father is mean, violent and drug-addicted.

Ship Breaker becomes a story about loyalty and heredity and the limits of trust when Nailer finds a “lucky strike,” something that could make him rich beyond his wildest dreams. Will he take advantage of his luck and run with it, or will he choose to save the life of a worthless and dangerous captive at the risk of his own? This story was exciting and spell-binding. It will appeal to Hunger Games fans and other readers of dystopian science fiction and technofiction.

I had only one problem with the book, not a problem that made me consider quitting the book, but a problem, nevertheless. Why does Nailer make the choices he makes? Nailer is a classic hero. He chooses right, no matter that he stands to gain riches and save his own life by making other decisions than the ones he makes. Why? He’s loyal to his friend, Pima, and her mother, Sadna, because they have taken care of him in the past, given him a place to stay, food, and a job. Tit for tat. Pima is Nailer’s crew leader, and Nailer has sworn a blood oath to “have her back”. Then, other people enter the equation, and although Nailer has no rational reason, and no real sense of morality, to give his loyalty to anyone else, he does. Why? Nailer himself doesn’t know, and the reader is never given any good insight into Nailer’s core allegiance either. He’s realistic about the cruelty of the world he lives, somewhat superstitious, and highly intelligent inspite of his lack of education and opportunity. So why does he turn quixotic without Quixote’s code of knightly honor to sustain him?

“The blood bond was nothing. It was the people that mattered. If they covered your back, and you covered theirs, then maybe that was worth calling family. Everything else was just so much smoke and lies.”

If that’s so, then why does Nailer sacrifice himself for someone who has done nothing for him and very likely never will?

Still, it’s a good book, and you may find answers to my questions that I didn’t see. Warning: Lots of violence, very little or no language or sexual situations.

Saturday Review of Books: January 15, 2011

“Second-hand books are wild books, homeless books; they have come together in vast flocks of variegated feather, and have a charm which the domesticated volumes of the library lack. Besides, in this random miscellaneous company we may rub against some complete stranger who will, with luck, turn into the best friend we have in the world.”~Virginia Wolfe in her essay, “Street Haunting”

SatReviewbuttonIf you’re not familiar with and linking to and perusing the Saturday Review of Books here at Semicolon, you’re missing out. Here’s how it usually works. Find a review on your blog posted sometime during the previous week of a book you were reading or a book you’ve read. The review doesn’t have to be a formal sort of thing. You can just write your thoughts on a particular book, a few ideas inspired by reading the book, your evaluation, quotations, whatever.

Then on Saturday, you post a link here at Semicolon in Mr. Linky to the specific post where you’ve written your book review. Don’t link to your main blog page because this kind of link makes it hard to find the book review, especially when people drop in later after you’ve added new content to your blog. In parentheses after your name, add the title of the book you’re reviewing. This addition will help people to find the reviews they’re most interested in reading.

After linking to your own reviews, you can spend as long as you want reading the reviews of other bloggers for the week and adding to your wishlist of books to read. That’s how my own TBR list has become completely unmanageable and the reason I can’t join any reading challenges. I have my own personal challenge that never ends.

1. The Friendly Book Nook (To Have and To Kill)
2. the Ink Slinger (Lone Survivor)
3. Bonnie (The Breaking of Eggs)
4. Melissa @ The Betty and Boo Chronicles (Innocence)
5. Donovan @ Where Peen Meets Paper (Room)
6. Heather (I Want Big Red Apple Said Robot)
7. Janet, Across the Page (Unbroken)
8. Janet, Across the Page (Humphrey stories)
9. Summer@The Brothers H (The Road )
10. Semicolon (The Narnia Code)
11. Semicolon (The Unbearable Lightness of Scones)
12. Alice@Supratentorial(Little House on the Freeway)
13. Semicolon (Little Bee)
14. Alice@Supratentorial(Good Masters! Sweet Ladies!)
15. Semicolon (Moon Over Manifest)
16. Reading to Know (Rainbow Valley)
17. Reading to Know (Legends of Prince Edward Island)
18. Heather @ Books For Breakfast (Maggie and the Pirate
19. Reading to Know (The Dollhouse Magic)
20. Amy @ Hope Is the Word (A Long Walk to Water by Linda Sue Park)
21. Amy @ Hope Is the Word (Read Aloud Thursday–snow books)
22. Florinda @ The 3 R’s Blog (The Lotus Eaters)
23. SuziQoregon @ Whimpulsive (How to Survive a Garden Gnome Attack)
24. SuziQoregon @ Whimpulsive (Blood of My Brother)
25. Melody @ Fingers & Prose (Room)
26. Melody @ Fingers & Prose (Persuasion)
27. Nicole @ Linus’s Blanket (Revolution)
28. Beckie@ByTheBook (The Search)
29. Nicole @ Linus’s Blanket (Wide Sargasso Sea)
30. Nicole @ Linus’s Blanket (The Poison Tree)
31. Carol in Oregon (Old House of Fear)
32. Beth@Weavings (A Tangled Web)
33. Barbara H. (Anne of Avonles)
34. Krakovianka (Island of the World)
35. Zee @ Notes from the North (The Unstrung Harp; or, Mr Earbrass Writes a Novel)
36. Lazygal (Other Words for Love)
37. Lazygal (The White Devil)
38. Lazygal (Stay)
39. Lazygal (Country House Garden)
40. Lazygal (Forge)
41. Lazygal (The Young Italians)
42. Lazygal (Earth [the book])
43. Lazygal (Mudbound)
44. Always Chasing Boys (Blindness)
45. Between the Stacks (Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus!)
46. Word Lily (Fiddler’s Green)
47. SmallWorld Reads (Amy and Isabelle)
48. melydia (Spook)
49. Girl Detective (Pattern Recognition)
50. Book Journey (365 Thank Yous)
51. Megan @ Leafing Through Life (The Blue Notebook)
52. Mystie (Mother’s Rule of Life)
53. Megan @ Leafing Through Life (If I Stay)
54. Darren @ Bart’s Bookshelf [The Girl Next Door]
55. Darren @ Bart’s Bookshelf [How They Met and Other Stories]
56. Lucybird’s Book Blog (The News Where You Are)
57. Lucybird’s Book Blog (One Day)
58. Lucybird’s Book Blog (West End Girls)
59. Anne (Unbroken)
60. Amber Stults (Little Bee)
61. Amber Stults (The Outlander)
62. JHS (GIVEAWAY & Review: Autographed copy of To Nourish and Consume)
63. JHS (Happy Hours)
64. JHS (J’adore New York)
65. Luna Park by Kevin Baker
66. Nicola (Crogan’s March by Chris Schweizer)
67. 2 Stone Arch Easy Reader Graphic Novels
68. Nicola (The Zabime Sisters by Aristophane)
69. Nicola (Christie’s Peril at End House Graphic Novel)
70. Nicola (Incorruptible, Vol. 2 by Mark Waid)
71. Nicola (A Letter to Mrs. Roosevelt by C. Coco de Young)
72. Kara @ Home With Purpose (A Praying Life)
73. Kara @ Home With Purpose (Everyday Justice)
74. The Cath in the Hat (Meet Mammoth)
75. kort @ one deep drawer
76. Gina @ Bookscount (Those who save us)
77. Diary of an Eccentric (The Strange Case of Origami Yoda)
78. Diary of an Eccentric (Dangerous Neighbors)

Powered by… Mister Linky’s Magical Widgets.

Split by Swati Avasthi

See below the review of Andrew Klavan’s The Identity Man. Split is another book about change and whether it is possible for a young man to become a new person, leave behind his old patterns of thinking and his past crimes, and as Jace, the protagonist in this book, puts it, “take the bastard-no-longer pledge.”

When sixteen year old Jace shows up on his older brother Christian’s front step with a split lip, a few dollars, and a reluctance to answer questions, it’s touch and go as to whether or not Christian will let Jace stay–even overnight. Both young men are running from their abusive father, and together they endanger each other. However, Jace has nowhere else to go, and maybe, even though he’s possibly a broken kid, unfixable and dangerous, perhaps he’s not hopeless yet. At least Jace would like to convince himself and Christian that it’s not too late, that he can leave his dad and the anger that is his dad’s bequest to him, all behind.

Again, the question is “can a person really change, become new, leave the past behind?” If so, how? Jace tries sheer will power, and that works for him to some extent. He also finds a “good woman,” but he’s afraid to take advantage of the benefits of a loving relationship with a girl he is attracted to because he’s afraid he can’t be the good man she needs and deserves. Finally, the answers in this book are honesty, brotherly loyalty and love, exercise for the purpose of anger management, and taking it one day, one hour, one minute at a time. Those are pretty good answers, perhaps inadequate in the long run, but perhaps not as far as leaving an abusive past behind.

Split was one of the books on the shortlist for the Cybils in the category of Young Adult Fiction, and I’m definitely understanding why it’s one of the top books that the panel chose. The relationship cues and under-currents are subtle and spot on, and Jace is an intelligent and astute judge of character, even of his own. His insights into what is going on beneath the surface of his family’s dynamics, plus the references to Shakespeare and other literary lights, were what made the book for me.

Warning: some language, (domestic) violence, and sexual references make this a book for mature young adults with a tolerance for that sort of material.

Moon Over Manifest by Clare Vanderpool

So, on Monday Moon Over Manifest was something of a surprise winner of the Newbery Medal for “the most distinguished American children’s book published the previous year” (2010). And I just happened to have a copy of the winning book in my library basket, a leftover from the Cybils Middle Grade Fiction panel that I hadn’t been able to find before the deadline in late December for our shortlist to be finalized. I read the book yesterday.

I can now say that if the publisher (Delacorte) had seen fit to send a review copy, I might very well have pushed to put Moon Over Manifest on our shortlist. Of course, that’s easy to say now, hindsight and all. But I haven’t been too excited about or fond of some of the recent Newbery Award books. And I said so. Last year’s book, When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead was great, but of course, I’m a Madeleine L’Engle fan, so I would like anything that paid tribute to A Wrinkle in Time. I tried to read Neil Gaiman’s The Graveyard Book three times year before last and never got past the first few chapters. Good Masters! Sweet Ladies! seemed sort of, dare I say it, boring, and The Higher Power of Lucky was just O.K.

Moon Over Manifest is the story of a girl, twelve year old Abilene Tucker, whose father, Gideon, is a hobo. Abilene and her dad have been riding the rails together for as long as she can remember, but now (summer, 1936) Gideon has sent Abilene to live with an old friend of his in Manifest, Kansas while Gideon takes a job on the railroad back in Iowa. Abilene is not happy about being separated from her loving and beloved father, and she is determined that Gideon will come get her by the end of the summer. In the meantime, Abilene wants to find some information about the time Gideon spent in Manifest during World War I, before Abilene was born. What she gets is a nun, Sister Redempta, who teaches at the Sacred Heart of the Holy Redeemer Elementary School and gives her a summer assignment on the last day of school. Abilene also meets:
Shady Howard, the bootlegger who is also the interim pastor of the First Baptist Church
Miss Sadie, fortune teller, spirit medium, conjurer, and story-teller extraordinaire,
Hattie Mae Harper Macke, newspaper columnist and amateur historian of Manifest,
and two new friends, Lettie and Ruthanne, who join Abilene in searching for The Rattler, a spy who may or may not be selling secrets from Manifest to the enemy.

The story alternates between 1936 and Abilene and her friends and 1917-18 when the Manifest townspeople of 1936 were just growing up and when Abilene’s father should have been making his mark on Manifest’s history. Will Abilene find mention of her father in any of the stories Miss Sadie tells? How does Miss Sadie know so much about all of the secrets and events that make up the story of Manifest, Kansas? Does Shady have stories to tell about Abilene’s father? Who is or was The Rattler, and is he still in Manifest, spying on people and keeping secrets? Will Gideon come back to get Abilene, or has he deserted her for good?

Let’s start with the cover. Abilene is walking on the railroad track, thinking about her father and about the stories Miss Sadie tells. Do kids walk on the railroad tracks anymore? I lived about four blocks from the railroad tracks when I was growing up, and I certainly did. I walked along the tracks and looked for lost coins and thought about stuff. I love the cover of this book. So nostalgic.

Then there’s the story. Abilene is an engaging character, independent, feisty, and determined. But she’s also respectful and grateful for the people in Manifest who help her and feed her and take care of her. I like respectful and thankful, since it seems to be in short supply sometimes in book characters and in real kids. Abilene’s story feels real and has a flavor of the summertime adventures of the Jem and Scout in To Kill a Mockingbird. Abilene and her two buddies roam all over Manifest all summer long, and they make up stories and hunt for The Rattler with impunity and without much adult interference. The adults are available, but not over-involved. I think my kids could use some of that kind of independence and free-range experience.

As Abilene grows up over the course of the summer, she also learns more about her father and about his history, his character, and his flaws. Twelve is about the right time for a daughter to begin to see her father as a real person with a past and with hurts that need to be healed. In Moon Over Manifest, Gideon is a good father who “deserts” his daughter for good reasons, unlike the mother in another lauded book of 2010, One Crazy Summer. In facter the two books could be compared in several ways—feisty young heroine, absent parent, a summer of growth and discovery, people who are not who they seem to be–and I think Moon Over Manifest would come out the winner in a head-to-head competition between the two books.

So, Moon Over Manifest is a fine novel; it will probably appeal most to mature readers with good to excellent reading skills. The chronological jumps are well marked and easy to follow, but some of the psychological insights into family history and relationships are going to go over the head of young readers no matter how well they can follow the plot. Still, Ms. Vanderpool’s book is a good addition to the historical fiction of the Great Depression and a worthy Newbery Medalist.

Little Bee by Chris Cleave

My sister suggested, practically mandated, that I read this book. And the inside-the-cover blurb suggests, practically mandates, that reviewers of this particular title not provide much plot summary. They say it would spoil the experience of the story to tell you what happens or even talk about the characters. I had some issues with the book, even though I found it an absorbing read, so I’m going to disobey and talk about the characters and even the plot in general terms and see if I can work through my issues. If you are considering Little Bee as your next read and you are afraid that my discussion will spoil it for you, don’t read. You have been warned.

Little Bee, the title character, is a Nigerian refugee who has been imprisoned in a British immigrant detainment center for the past two years. The book is about what happens when Little Bee gets out of the detainment center and about what happened two and a half years before on a beach in Nigeria to Little Bee and to a couple from England, Andrew and Sarah. The good part about this book is that I read it to the end to see what would happen to the characters. Therefore, I must have cared what happened to the characters. But, however, nevertheless, I don’t really think I did, care, that is. I didn’t like them very much. Oh, it was easy to feel sympathy for Little Bee, a refugee from the horrors of civil war and cruelty in Nigeria’s oil disputes. But even while I was feeling very, very sorry for her, I also felt as if I were being manipulated somehow. I do sympathize with refugees and illegal immigrants. I tend to believe in open borders, although I’m not sure how that sort of governmental policy would work out in reality. I think it’s horrible and bad policy to keep people in some kind of pseudo-prison while their refugee status is pending approval from on high, an approval that hardly ever comes. But many, many illegal immigrants are not in fear of being murdered if they return to their home countries. Some are in fear of starving to death; others just want to make a better life for themselves and their families. A few are very likely terrorists themselves. In other words, the character of Little Bee is a sympathetic over-simplification of the immigration issue.

And Sarah is (spoiler warning) an adulteress, with no good excuse or justification for her behavior. Andrew, Sarah’s husband, is a coward in a moment of extreme stress when an instant decision is required. I couldn’t really fault him; I probably wouldn’t be able to make the courageous sacrifice he was asked to make on the spur of the moment either. But Andrew’s character was never really fleshed out beyond that one fateful decision anyway, so I didn’t care much about him either. Lawrence, the “other man,” was a wimp and a cheater, so I couldn’t stand him. And Charlie, Sarah’s and Andrew’s four year old son, wore his Batman suit throughout the story and unknowingly caused a couple of really bad things to happen, so I wanted someone to keep a better eye on him and keep him from causing such trouble. No one did.

I dunno. If you’re up for a tragic story about some well meaning people who happen to have serious issues, you might like Little Bee very much. On a different day, I might write a more positive review. Today a mildly discontented review, and links to other bloggers that really liked it a lot, is all I can do.

Other views and reviews:
Caribousmom: “Cleave’s prose is ironic, at times humorous (although the themes of the novel are anything but funny), and original.” (I agree with that description of the writing in this book. The dialogue, and the inner monologue, in particular, were captivating.)
Judy at Carpe Libris: “I love the title character and her deep honesty about life. Also, her observations of human nature are compelling. Too bad she is not real. I would love to meet her someday.”
Rhapsody in Books: “The facts that Cleave brings to your attention about Nigeria and about detention centers are undeniably true, and that’s what I believe you will take away from this story. It’s yet another good reminder of how truly fortunate we are.”
Hey, Lady! Whatcha Readin’?: “Where I think the author excels is in getting the reader to examine their own humanity. What would you give up for someone else’s life? When put in this situation, a person learns their character, and in one character’s case in this book, found they came up short.”