A couple of years ago I started on a Madeleine L’Engle Project. My goal was to read or re-read all of Ms. L’Engle’s books in the order in which they were published. I didn’t get all that far, but I did re-read some favorites and post about them here at Semicolon. Then, I became distracted by other projects, and I haven’t read anything by Madeleine L’Engle in a while.
So, I am pleased the my participation in the Faith and Fiction Roundtable impelled me to read Certain Women again, one of Ms. L’Engle’s later novels. It’s the story of famous stage actor David Wheaton who is dying of cancer, attended by the wife of his old age, Alice, and by his daughter, Emma, who is also an actress. Alice is actually David Wheaton’s ninth and final wife, and he has nine children, the products of eight previous failed marriages. David Wheaton has always wanted to play the role of King David from the Bible, but the opportunity never came. As Wheaton reviews his life, he and his complicated family see the analogies between the life of David Wheaton, actor, and the life of David, sweet singer and King of Israel.
In the hands of another writer, this book would probably have been about David Wheaton, a man who married many wives and whose life experiences bore a certain resemblance to those of King David, with the similarities being left to the reader to discover. L’Engle chose to highlight the analogies by having Emma’s husband, a playwright, spend most of the novel attempting to write a play, specifically a vehicle for Wheaton to star as King David. By the opening of the novel, the play is a failed attempt that never was completed, and David Wheaton is much too old and sick to play the part of David anyway. But as the novel progresses the characters review scenes that were written about David and his many wives: Michal, Ahinoam, Abigail, Maacah, Bathsheba, Abishag, and others. And Wheaton and his family discuss the similarities between the Wheaton family and King David’s family and the differences. Somehow the Biblical stories give the characters insight into their own family dynamic and help them to reconcile with God and with each other.
I thought the first time I read the book, and I remembered again as I re-read, that this novel in particular, of all Madeleine L’Engle’s novels, has a certain soap opera quality to it. (Madeleine L’Engle’s husband was an actor and a long time character on the daytime drama, All My Children.) The characters move in and out of one another’s lives like soap opera characters, and there’s a lot of adultery, divorce, re-marriage, and other family drama (nothing terribly explicit or offensive). However, L’Engle’s people are more complicated and have more depth to them than the average soap opera witch or ingenue. The story this time around reminded me of Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead in its portrayal of an old man preparing to die, reminiscing about his life, and trying to understand the decisions he’s made and their ongoing effect on his family members. Gilead is probably, almost certainly, the better written book, but somehow Madeleine L’Engle’s books always speak to me.
In this reading I was impressed by the importance of forgiveness for both the sinner and the one sinned against:
“He said that it was only after David lusted after Bathsheba, caused Uriah’s death, only after he had failed utterly with Tamar and Amnon and Absalom, only after he was fleeing his enemies, fleeing his holy city of Jerusalem, that he truly became a king.”
“Parents always fail their children. If we’d had children, we’d have failed ours. That’s simply how it is, and the kids have to get along as best they can. My parents were who they were. Dave is Dave.”
“Emma closed her eyes. There was a terrible empty space where Etienne and Adair should have been. ‘What is forgiveness?’
Chantal’s long fingers gripped the steering wheel. ‘It’s not forgetting. That’s repression, not forgiveness.’
Emma looked over at her sister.
‘Remembering,’ Chantal said, ‘but not hurting anymore.'”
What is your definition of forgiveness? And how do you forgive someone who is either absent or unrepentant?
Jesus said of the prostitute who washed his feet, “Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven–for she loved much. But he who has been forgiven little loves little.” Perhaps only those who know that they have sinned greatly can understand and experience the depth of God’s grace, mercy, and love.
Other participants in today’s discussion of Certain Women:
My Friend Amy: Certain Women, The Women in David’s Life
Heather at Book Addiction.
Book Hooked Blog.
Sheila at Book Journey
Jennifer at Crazy for Books
Carrie at Books and Movies
Ronnica at The Ignorant Historian
Thomas at My Random Thoughts
The 3r’s Blog: Reading, ‘Riting, and Randomness
Word Lily
Tina’s Book Reviews
The ability to forgive those who are unrepentant – that is something I have struggled with for a long, long time. I know that as a group we had very mixed reactions to this book, but it still provoked a great discussion!
I meant to read this one but I never got a copy. I like that definition of forgiveness (‘though like is not the right word here) and I enjoyed reading your thoughts.
Forgiveness definitely seems to be a common theme many people appreciated from the book!
I read this one a few years ago, and I agree with you about the soap opera quality. And I agree that Gilead is better written. But I liked this book — even though I wasn’t able to explain why. (I may have a genetic predisposition to liking Madeleine L’Engle…)
This was a re-read for me as well, and I do agree with you about the soap-operatic qualities of the novel! They bothered me much less this time around, though. I didn’t hone in on the forgiveness theme the way you did, but it is a significant one, and I think it comes across in L’Engle’s compassionate treatment of her characters.
The theme of forgiveness was huge to me as I was reading the book. It was definitely the most clear theme that I saw throughout the novel, at least the one that most spoke to me. I haven’t read Gilead but I do own it and definitely would like to get to it soon!
This sounds very interesting, Sherry…I think I could get into it. I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I’ve never read anything by Madeleine L’Engle!
I wanted to let you know that I linked to you on my book blog today. Hope you’ll stop by and visit. I’m still struggling to attract readers to my book blog!
I’m so glad you included those quotes, particularly the one where Chantal tells us that forgiving is not forgetting, but it’s remembering without hurting. It stood out to me when I first read the book because I so completely disagree with that idea. So many things that need to be forgiven will never stop hurting. Rape, abuse, divorce, etc aren’t things that will ever stop hurting, but are things that need to be forgiven. I think forgiveness involves remembering and hurting, but not requiring justice. I don’t justice in the legal sense, but in the sense of retribution. Forgiving is accepting that the other person may never “pay” for what they did the way you would like them to.
So I have this person in my life that I need to forgive. This person did something that I want him, not necessarily to pay for, as much as I want him to mend his ways, never do that to another person, recognize his error. I realize and accept that this repentance may never happen because right now the person doesn’t see that he’s done anything wrong or hurtful. So now I avoid the person and don’t want to have anything to do with him even though he’s my brother in Christ. It “hurts” to see this person who hurt me and my family going about as if nothing happened.
SO have I forgiven because I accept the obvious fact that repentance and/or justice may never happen? Or have I not forgiven because I still hurt and harbor some resentment? Do I play along with the “nothing happened” scenario? Do I confront? Do I just wait for God to heal?
Hard questions for which I have no answers.
Pingback: Sunday Salon: Books Read in February, 2011 | Semicolon
Pingback: Saturday Review of Books: March 5, 2011 | Semicolon
Pingback: A Madeleine L’Engle Annotated Bibliography | Semicolon