Archive | August 2006

Edgy or Porn?

In this piece on Edgy Fiction, J. Mark Bertrand gives the rules, in progression, for writing about sex in fiction.

As a reader, I used to say that I didn’t mind reading about sex, but I preferred not to see it depicted on the screen in vivid color in movies since I considered the actions of the actors in acting out illicit sex to be immoral in and of themselves. So, I don’t watch many R-rated movies. However, I have come to find out that I am also uncomfortable with graphic descriptions of sex, and sexual perversion, in books. I don’t believe that this discomfort with, indeed aversion to, graphic sex (and violence) in books is prudery or a lack of literary apppreciation. I believe it’s wisdom and discernment.

I started reading Doctorow’s Ragtime over the weekend. I first thought it was a bit odd. The writing style is clipped and jerky and takes some getting used to. Then, I decided that it was interesting. Doctorow places real historical characters, such as Houdini and Emma Goldman, into his fictional story of turn-of-the-century America. I was curious to see where he would go with these characters, how much fact would be mixed into the fiction, how evocative of the early 1900’s the novel would be. Then, I came to the conclusion that not only does Doctorow mix fact with fiction; he also stirs in borderline pornography. I read a couple of scenes that were intentionally titilating and rather nasty. So, whatever I’m missing, I’ll just have to miss it.

My question is: I have another book by Doctorow, The March, on THE LIST. Should I skip it, too? Profanity, as in profaning what is sacred, offends me. Graphic descriptions of sex and sexual perversion profane that which God ordained (beautiful sex within marriage) and make it seem twisted and satanic. It’s an immoral use of one of God’s greatest gifts, the gift of words.

Saturday Review of Books

The links for the Saturday Review of Books are all up now. Scroll down to link to some great book reviews. If you didn’t make it over here on Saturday, you can still add a link to your book review from last week.

I’m sorry the Mr. Linky wasn’t working on Saturday. We were on our annual pilgrimage to Winedale for a taste of Shakespeare. (More about that tomorrow.) So I didn’t know it wasn’t working until yesterday. Mr. Linky said it had something to do with an apostrophe? Oh, those troublesome punctuation marks!

Anyway, it’s all there now. Take a look and read some reviews. I found at least three books to add to my list.

Best Laughs

THE BEST LAUGHS (According to the Penguin List)

Cold Comfort Farm
Stella Gibbons
The Diary of a Nobody
George and Weedon Grossmith
The Pickwick Papers
Charles Dickens
Scoop
Evelyn Waugh
Lucky Jim
Kingsley Amis

Best Laughs (according to Semicolon):

I haven’t read any of the Penguin choices in this category except for Pickwick, and although I adore Dickens, I think there are funnier books in the world than Pickwick Papers.

All Creatures Great and Small by James Herriot. I don’t even like animals very much, but these books aren’t just about animals. They are about a Yorkshire veterinarian, and his eccentric co-workers, and his even more eccentric clientele. These stories are funny, touching, and memorable.

Right Ho, Jeeves (or any other Bertie and Jeeves book) by P.G. Wodehouse. I haven’t read Scoop by Evelyn Waugh yet, although I’m planning to do so for Kimbofo’s Reading Matters Book Group; however, if Brideshead Revisited is an example of Waugh’s humor, Wodehouse is a lot funnier.

The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde. Did we say no plays or just no Shakespeare? No, Penguin listed several in other categories, so I’m safe to laugh uproariously at Mr. Wilde.

Cheaper by the Dozen by Ernestine and Frank Gilbreath. Not a classic? Sez who? The Gilbreaths are classically funny and delightful.

Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll. Penguin lists this one under “Best Journeys,” but I think it’ll fit better here. I can think of lots of epic journeys in literature, but how many authors are as laugh out loud funny as Lewis Carroll?

So what’s the funniest book you’ve ever read? Is it a classic? Will your grandchildren still be reading it and laughing fifty years from now?

Book-Spotting #16

Tim Challies writes that Stephen Lawhead has a new novel coming out in September, Hood, the story of a Welsh Robin Hood. No fair, why can’t I get a review copy of a Stephen Lawhead book!

Kate on Criteria for Culling the Collection. I have trouble with this task as I think most bibliophiles do. My house is full of books. I can’t shelve all of my books. But I have another reason for keeping certain books that Kate doesn’t mention: I think, “Yes, I’ve already read it, but my children will want to read this book someday. All eight of them. Or my grandchildren will read it.” I don’t have any grandchildren yet. So I keep the books, lots of books.

A Small Death in Lisbon not only sounds like a good book to add to the LIST, but this marketing by chance and word of mouth story is a good story. Authors and publishers take note. Handselling and interpersonal publicity does work sometimes, but you can’t really control it. Only encourage it.

Martin O’Malley on reading slowly.

“I feel no guilt whatsoever about being a slow reader, or about not having read all the great books, or about abandoning a book halfway through because I’m bored. There are two things in life one must never do out of a sense of duty, and one is read.”

Here’s another link to the list of the best 100 Penguin classics from The London Times. It’s divided into categories, five books in each category. I will be dissecting and commenting soon; in the meantime, what do you think of the list?

Rules for Penguin’s List of 100 Best Classics

To celebrate its 60th anniversary, Penguin Classics has compiled a list of 100 best classics in twenty categories. I like the categories, at least some of them, and thought they’d make for interesting discussion here at Semicolon. I followed only a few rules, not exactly the same rules that Penguin followed in making its list:

1. First of all, I didn’t choose any books for my list that I hadn’t read. I may not even like all the books I chose, but I have at least read them. Penguin’s choices may be a bit more eclectic and broad since I assume they had a panel of editors to choose their classics list. Nevertheless, my list will be suitably eccentric and personally pleasing.

2. As the Penguin listers didn’t use any book twice even though some could fit into more than one category, neither did I. I did, however, feel free to list more than one book by a given author.

3. Most of my classics are fiction because that’s what I’ve read the most. Most of the Penguin list consists of fiction, too.

4. “There is no Shakespeare because Penguin has a separate imprint for the Bard and in any case how could the rest of the literary canon compete?” OK, I’ll go along with that restriction. However, I didn’t check to see if my other choices are Penguin classics or not, and I’m sure many of them are not. That’s OK because I don’t work for Penguin or any other publisher, and I’ve already given them enough free publicity.

So, my next twenty posts will be my take on the the best in Penguin’s various categories. Please add your thoughts as you read along. Let us discuss the best in literature.

Mission to Cathay by Madeleine Polland

Mission to Cathay tells the fictionalized story of Father Matteo Ricci, the first Western Christian missionary to enter mainland China. In 1583, Father Ricci gained permission to build a mission in Suiching in southern China near Canton. He stayed in Suiching until 1589 when he was expelled by a hostile government official. After that, he travelled to other cities in China and eventually had an audience withe Emperor in Peking. Father Ricci stayed in China until his death, and he was honored with a state funeral by order of the Emperor.

The book covers only the first few years of Father Ricci’s stay in Suiching from the point of view of a servant boy with a mysterious past. With only the name Boy and no family that he knows about, the servant becomes a part of the family of the Lord of Heaven, although his Chinese mind is far from understanding what it means to be in the family of God through Christ. Father Ricci tries to comunicate the gospel to the Chinese by becoming a part of their culture, but he fears losing himself in vast and ancient land. Anothe subplot involves Boy meeting a mysterious boy named Chang with a secret so perilous that it could endanger the entire Christian mission to China.

The ending to this book and the solution to all the mysterious occurences was too easily deciphered from all the clues that were rather obviously embedded in the story. However, it might not be as obvious to elementary age children. I did enjoy the pieces of Chinese history and culture that were a part of the story. This book would make a good read aloud for a unit study on China or Chinese or world history.

Saturday Review of Books: August 5, 2006

It’s that time again. Let’s share some book reviews. Last Saturday’s Review of Books went well for the first week: seventeen people posted reviews.

For the uninitiated, here’s how it works. Find a review on your blog posted sometime this week of a book you’re reading or a book you’ve read. The review doesn’t have to be a formal sort of thing. You can just write your thoughts on a particular book, a few ideas inspired by reading the book, your evaluation, whatever.

Now post a link here to the specific post where you’ve written your book review. Don’t link to your main blog page because this kind of link makes it hard to find the book review, especially when people drop in later after you’ve added new content to your blog. Please add only one book review per customer per week. (However, if your children, friends, orother family members have their own blogs and have written on a book, they are welcome to add their own link.) In parentheses after your name, add the title of the book you’ve written about. This addition will help people to find the reviews they’re most interested in reading.

Finally, follow the links to read other people’s book reviews for the week. You might discover some books to add to your list (or some books to avoid).

1. SFP (Triangle by Katharine Weber)
2. At A Hen\’s Pace (Mama\’s Bank Account)
3. Jennifer Snapshot
4. Allison (Tear Soup)
5. Carrie K (Where Is God)
6. Ellen (Forgiven to Forgiving)
7. Kathryn (Sheiks and Adders)
8. Little WIllow (Boy Heaven)
9. Mother Reader (The Wizard, the Witch . . .)
10. Loni (Trial by Ordeal)
11. Phil (New Light)
12. Amanda (A Meaningful World)
13. Semicolon (Princess Academy)

Auto-Linkies!!   Powered by… Mister Linky’s Magical Widgets.   As seen on all of the finest blogs!!

Friday’s Center of the Blogosphere

A Reading Garden. I’ve never heard of such a thing, but what a wonderful idea!

On a different note, consider yourself warned by this rather frightening article: Global Homeschooling: A Spunky Exclusive.

Steve Riddle of Flos Carmeli on Aesthetic Tyrants. I agree wholeheartedly. What he said.

The Headmistress of the The Common Room on being a chain-reader and a binge-booker. Are you either or both?

De at Thinklings has an excerpt from a Beliefnet interview with Ann Coulter. I hereby declare my independence from aesthetic tyrants by saying that I like Ann Coulter. I think she’s funny. I also think after reading the entire interview that she’s a Christian, however imperfectly she lives her faith. (However imperfectly I live, and I do, my Lord still loves and saves me. “Except for grace by which I stand . . .”)

Brideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh

Some people told me I should add Waugh to my list of books and authors with a touch of Catholicism. However, since I had never read anything by Mr. Waugh and I was only listing books with which I was at least familiar, I couldn’t very well add his books to the post.

Well, I can now, but Brideshead Revisited doesn’t have a touch of Catholicism; it’s all about being Catholic, particularly being Catholic in the early twentieth century in England. And I can’t decide whether Waugh thinks it’s an overall good thing to be Catholic or a very bad, mess-up-your-life thing. The Catholics in the book all come back to their faith in one way or another, but they are all really confused and thwarted by their Catholic upbringing and heritage in the meantime. So can someone else tell me, is this book pro-Catholic or anti-Catholic? Or neither?

I kept comparing the attitude toward Catholicism and growing up Catholic in the book to my childhood culture of contemporary evangelicalism. But I just didn’t and don’t still have the issues that these characters have in Brideshead Revisited. The basic problem seems to be that they can’t enjoy sin and its pleasures because their Catholic-trained conscience gets in the way. Or, alternately, they can’t live life to its fullest because they listen to Catholic doctrine and attempt to follow it. However, there aren’t many sins in evangelical churches that would get you excommunicated. Even divorce and adultery have been known to fail to get so much as a reprimand. In the Catholic church it’s necessary to at least express some kind of repentance and remorse in order to obtain assurance of forgiveness. So it’s harder for the family in the book to reconcile their actions with their beliefs. Since my temptations lie more in the areas of bitterness, anger, and gossip and since nobody talks much about those sins, I can get off without so much as a trip to confession in my church, and my level of discomfort depends on the activity level of my conscience, not on the disapprobation of the church authorities or of fellow Christians.

What I am familiar with and know that Waugh nails is the attitude of many unbelievers toward all things Christian. The narrator of the novel is an agnostic and just doesn’t understand what all the fuss is about. Why do innocent conversations within this devout Catholic family turn into discussions about God and about the Church? Why do his friends have such a hard time shedding their Catholic heritage and rejecting Catholic doctrine? What’s the big deal? I have seen this attitude and the gap between believers and unbelievers so often. The first group, Christian believers, see that all life is related to and ends up in God/Christ. He’s the center. The other group, the agnostics and unbelievers, don’t understand why the Christians can’t just keep their “religion” in a box and pull it out in private. And never the twain shall meet.

Then, there’s another character in the novel who is essentially an unbeliever, too. However, because he wants to marry one of the Catholic characters, he decides to convert to Catholicism. The problem is that he doesn’t have a clue what being Catholic is all about, and he’s willing to say whatever he needs to say to get into the church because he doesn’t really believe or disbelieve any of it. I’ve seen this sort of person, too. Rex, the character in the book, is a little exaggerated, but only a little. I’ve seen husbands come to church, get baptized, attend faithfully, never knowing or caring what any of it is all about, just in order to make their wives happy or to be a member of the community or to make business contacts.

If you’re Catholic, I would highly recommend Brideshead Revisited for an examination of what it means to be Catholic, especially in a place and time where faithful Catholics are in the minority. If you’re not Catholic, I would also recommend the book as an examination of what it means to be faithful, the limits and psychological effects of legalism, and the possibilities of grace within a religious system. I thnk maybe (feel free to correct me) Brideshead Revisited is about how we can muddle through to grace and repentance and forgiveness and God even in our very human confusion and self-inflicted degradation.

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born August 3rd

Two of my favorite novelists have birthdays today: Baroness Phyllis Dorothy James (b. 1920) and Leon Marcus Uris (b. 1924, d. 2003).

Although I like her detective novels very much, my favorite P. D. James novel as of now is Children of Men, a dystopian novel about a world where no children are born. I suggest that those who are struggling with the “quiver-full question” read James’ rather chilling picture of a future with no children at all. Read my review here. A movie version of Children of Men is due out in September. Computer Guru Son just read the book and liked it, I think.

Leon Uris is sometimes described as a “Zionist” and one obituary in the British newspaper The Guardian referred to him as a racist for his portrayal of Arabs in his admittedly pro-Jewish novels. I think this is an unfair accusation, but if you are Palestinian, or sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, you might not enjoy Uris’ novels as much as I do. Exodus, Mila 18, and QB VIII are all great stories with lots of historical information about Israel and the experience of modern Jews in Europe during and after World War II.
My thoughts about Uris and James and their books on this date in 2004.

Also born on this date:
Mary Calhoun, picture book author of Hot-Air Henry and other books about Henry the Adventurous Cat. I like the story of Henry getting trapped in a hot air balloon and going for a wild ride. It also seems appropriate for this time of year since this balloon lift-off event takes place a few miles from my home at the end of this month.
Anyone want to come visit? I’ll make you some enchildadas, beans and rice.

Fianlly, actress Evangeline Lilly is 27 years old today. Is anyone else going through LOST withdrawal this summer?

Edited and updated from June, 2005.