Archives

Not Just a Political Statement

This is not just a political statement by a guy who happens to believe that he should be elected vice-president. It’s a religious statement. The government cannot, and should not try to, provide for all our needs and wants. Jesus said, “You shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free.” That truth is two-fold:

First of all, we will never be completely want-free, totally satisfied, without any problems or needs, here on this earth. We live in a sin-marred, incomplete, imperfect world, and no government instituted among men, by men, can change that fact. The purpose of government is to “provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” We can argue about the lines that limit government in those basic duties, but any government or politician who promises the moon and everything in between is over-stepping his or her boundaries and responsibilities and giving out empty promises.

Secondly, freedom, adventure, and security are found only in Christ. Neither the Republican Party nor the Democrat Party nor Congress nor the President nor any other person or institution in all creation can provide us with true freedom, true joy, and true peace of mind. Those things are found only in Christ, imperfectly and partially here, perfectly and completely when we see Him face to face. If we are not free to pursue Christ and obey Him as the Holy Spirit guides us, then we are not free at all, no matter how we are blessed materially.

Warning: Political Rant

I have made what is for me a momentous political decision. I will be voting for neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney in November.

My reasons for rejecting Barack Obama are multitudinous: Obamacare, forcing Catholics to pay for birth control, cap-and-trade, the U.S. budget deficit, our huge and growing national debt, my higher personal taxes, the ridiculous unemployment rate, increased government regulation of almost everything, hubristic ideas of what government is responsible to do, etc. I could go on and on, but you get the idea.

However, and the powers that be in the Republican party need to hear this from a profusion of voices, as much as I want to have a new president in 2013, I refuse to vote for Bob Dole, John McCain, George H.W. Bush, etc. again. Hey, I like G.W. Bush, as a person and as a president, but even he was a compromise candidate who turned out better than I thought he would. I’ve done it over and over: voted for the Republican candidate because he was “better than the alternative.”

This time I refuse. If Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination, I will not vote for him. I will stay home or vote for a third-party candidate, and I will encourage my friends and family to do the same. I know all the arguments against such a course of action; I’ve used all the arguments to drum up support and convince myself and others to vote for, most recently, John McCain. “If you vote third-party or don’t vote, you’re just giving the election to Obama.” “This country can’t afford four more years of Obama.” “Anyone is better than President Obama.”

All I know is that as long as we sheep are willing to keep voting for McCain in a different suit, the media and the moneymen and the coastal Rhinos will keep giving us candidates who differ from the Democrat liberals only in degree, and not much of that. Romney only wants the state governments to take over our health care system, piece by piece, state by state. Romny only wants keep to the status quo as far as abortion is concerned, instead of imposing payment for abortion costs on taxpayers who don’t believe it’s morally just as Obama will do if he can. Romney only wants “regional” cap-and-trade programs. Romeny wants to “streamline processes” and “consolidate programs”, but I don’t see anywhere that he wants to eliminate anything that government is already doing. Romney wants to reduce taxes and cut some regulations here and there. At least, he says he does. But when he gets to Washington, I think he’ll compromise with Democrats and big government Republicans who pressure him to “do something” just as he says he compromised when he was governor of Massachusetts.

I live in Texas. By the time we have a primary, if we ever get a firm date for that event, I believe the nominee will already be chosen. Listen to me now: I will not vote for Mitt Romney. I have been here too long and seen this same scenario play out too many times. If you want a moderate Democrat-in-disguise to become president, you’ll have to find someone else to elect him. It won’t be me this time.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.

13 Observations, or Two Can Play at This Game

13 Observations Made by Someone of No Importance Who has No Famous Pseudonym While Reading Thirteen Observations made by Lemony Snicket while watching Occupy Wall Street from a Discreet Distance.

1. If you work hard and become successful, the two are more likely to be related than your hair length and your height are likely to be related. In other words, hard work in a free society often leads to financial success or at least a certain amount of financial security. People who are giants never have long hair because they are giants.

2. There is no such thing as luck, or fortune defined as luck. If you have a fortune aka a Lot of Money, there’s a reason. Somebody worked for it. Or stole it.

3. “Money is like a child–rarely unaccompanied.” If you want someone else’s money (or child), you’ll have to wait until he’s not looking and take it. Or you could get him to sign it over in return for something you do for him. Like work or provide a service or product. Rumplestiltskin got a baby (almost) in return for work, spinning gold. If you can do that, you’ll probably earn a lot of money.

4. People who say money doesn’t matter are right in the sense that that it’s the stuff we use the money to symbolize that matters. But they’re also wrong, because we need money for the basic stuff of life: food, shelter, clothing, and books. Cake doesn’t matter.

5. Just because I didn’t do everything that’s involved in making the cake, but rather used my skills to barter for money that I used to purchase certain necessities for making the cake doesn’t mean it’s not my cake, made by the fruit of my labor. If others want a cake, they can make their own, buy their own, or quit yelling and ask nicely.

6. Safety nets made by governments spending money that is borrowed from other governments are not trustworthy, and I would only want to fall into one if the alternative was death on the sidewalk. I might die anyway.

7. If you sit and have a drink with someone who has a grievance, be prepared to have more than one drink. And prepare to be the one who pays for all the drinks.

8. As we all tell our children, life isn’t fair. So don’t go around asking anyone if it is.

9. People gathering in the streets feeling wronged tend to be loud, not because there’s a tall building in front of them, but because they are like children who think that if they shout loudly enough they’ll get what they want. Tantrums are not nice and are rarely effective if a real adult is in charge.

10. If the people shouting outside have no solution to the problem, then why don’t they grow up and quit shouting and let the adults inside the building get on with trying to solve the problem?

11. When a parent ignores a two year old who is throwing a tantrum, the two year old sometimes stops the nonsense. However, this technique may be less effective with adult tantrum-throwers. The story may have a very unhappy ending, but whose fault is that? The parent or the (twenty)two year old who never grew up?

12. If you have a large crowd shouting outside your building, someone needs to tell them to go home and go to bed.

13. Lemony Snicket aka Daniel Handler is a part of the 1%, which is probably why he’s observing from a discreet distance instead of going down to OWS and handing out a lot of cash. Or cake. Or both.

Unplanned by Abby Johnson

Unplanned: The dramatic true story of a former Planned Parenthood leader’s eye-opening journey across the life line by Abby Johnson with Cindy Lambert.

Abby Johnson was the director of the Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Texas (home of Texas A&M and the Texas Aggies). She was committed to her work with Planned Parenthood because she truly believed that the services they provided helped women in crisis and had the long-term effect of making abortion less common by decreasing the incidence of unwanted pregnancies. She was idealistic, hard-working, and somewhat naive.

Then, in September 2009, Abby was called into an exam room at the Planned Prenthood clinic to help with an ultrasound-guided abortion. What she saw in the ultrasound picture changed her mind about abortion, about the pro-life movement, and ultimately about her own relationship with a loving God who loves Abby Johnson and the women who have abortions and the children who die in abortion clinics like Planned Parenthood every day.

One of the main things I got out of this book was not a change in my opinions about abortion; I know what I believe about the value of every human life. But I was so impressed by the loving persistence of the pro-life volunteers who loved and prayed for Abby Johnson for years before she finally saw the truth. I am so impatient. I have friends and family members who need to see God, who need to trust Jesus Christ, who need, and I have been praying for them and doing my best to love them as Christ loves me. But I am tired sometimes and discouraged. Will my loved ones ever see their needs and turn to a loving Saviour? How long, O Lord?

It took eight years for Abby Johnson to see the ugliness and greed behind her work at Planned Parenthood. Eight years. I have people I’ve been praying for only half that long, and it already feels like a lifetime. So, I learned from reading this book, something I already know: I can’t give up. Persistence, faith, love, and hope are gifts from the Holy Spirit indeed.

I am also moved to pray for Abby Johnson, whenever I think about her. It can’t be easy to have your life turned upside down, even when it’s God who does the turning.

My story is not neat and tidy, and it doesn’t come wrapped in easy answers. Oh, how we love to vilify our opponents—from both sides. How easy to assume that those on “our” side are right and wise and good; how those on “their” side are treacherous and foolish and deceptive. I have found right and good and wisdom on both sides. I have found foolishness and treachery and deception on both sides as well. I have experienced how good intentions can be warped into poor choices no matter what the side.

Don’t slam this book shut because of what I’ve just said. Read it for that very reason. Read it to understand the surprising hopes and motivations on the “other” side.~ Abby Johnson

Sunday Salon: Love and Marriage

The Sunday Salon.com

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP) — If leaders of Mexico City’s socialist democrat Party of the Democratic Revolution have their way, the city’s 2009 law legalizing gay “marriage” will be followed this year with temporary marriage licenses.

The minimum marriage contract would be for two years and could be renewed if the couple is happy, the bill’s co-author, Leonel Luna, told the Guardian newspaper. The licenses would include a pre-divorce agreement on the disposition of children and property if the couple decides to terminate the marriage.

“The proposal is, when the two-year period is up, if the relationship is not stable or harmonious, the contract simply ends,” Luna told the Guardian. “You wouldn’t have to go through the tortuous process of divorce.”

I wonder if one could write a dystopian/utopian novel about a society in which this kind of contract was the norm. What would a practice of moving every two years or so from one relationship to the next, always in search of that elusive “happiness”, do to people and families and societal stability? Would it be so very different from the society we’re living in now?

Why young Christians aren’t waiting anymore by Joe Blake.

“The article in Relevant magazine, entitled “(Almost) Everyone’s Doing It,” cited several studies examining the sexual activity of single Christians. One of the biggest surprises was a December 2009 study, conducted by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, which included information on sexual activity.

While the study’s primary report did not explore religion, some additional analysis focusing on sexual activity and religious identification yielded this result: 80 percent of unmarried evangelical young adults (18 to 29) said that they have had sex – slightly less than 88 percent of unmarried adults, according to the teen pregnancy prevention organization.”

So how is our culture very different from the Mexican socialist proposal that we legitimize short-term relationships and go on from there?

I still believe in marriage, life-long and for one man and one woman. However, if our culture has reached the point that this ideal is no longer practiced, even among a majority of professing Christians, what can we do to get the culture moving in a different direction?

Sociologically speaking, the one big difference – and it’s monstrous – between the biblical teaching and our culture is the arranged marriages of very young people. If you get married when you’re 13, you don’t have 15 years of temptation. ~Scott McKnight

I’m not suggesting, and neither is Mr. McKnight, that 13 year olds should be marrying. But what about seventeen, eighteen, and nineteen year olds? Why is it that eighteen year olds are old enough to join the army and old enough to vote, old enough to have sex, but not old enough to marry, according to cultural expectations?

We need stories, historical fiction, dystopian fiction and others, that explore the ramifications of these and other questions about marriage. If you are a writer, you have the power to move the conversation in our nation, not in a propagandistic way, but as a powerful by-product of the stories you choose to tell.

Banned Books Week–Again

I haven’t had much to say about Banned Books Week this year, mostly because I’ve said it before and I fear I would only repeat myself.

However, I do have a few links to share on the subject and related topics:

Banned books? How about banned posters? Shouldn’t professors have the right to put whatever poster they want in their own office?

Or banned statues? Actually, these yard sculptures haven’t been banned at all, but under the current popular terminology for Banned Books Week, they have been “challenged”—the neighbors are complaining. I think it’s a delightful collection, and I certainly wouldn’t mind having it in my neighborhood.

On a more serious and thoughtful note, Emily and Janie are doing a series of posts related to Banned Books Week at Redeemed Reader. These are well worth your reading time:

Light Your Library! Win Stuff, Love People, and Think Deeply by Emily Whitten, former children’s book editor and current homeschool mom.
Interview with Meghan Cox Gurdon, author of a controversial article in the Wall Street Journal that called the YA literature world to task for the increasing darkness and pessimism of young adult literature.
The Use and Abuse of Youth Literature by Janie B. Cheaney, young adult and middle grade fiction author and WORLD magazine columnist.
What Gets a Book “Banned”? by Janie B. Cheaney.

While you’re at Redeemed Reader, explore a bit. Janie’s and Emily’s blog has become a new favorite of mine.

1917: Books and Literature

The first Pulitzer Prizes were awarded in 1917. One of the first prizes awarded was for editorial writing, and the first winner was an editorial about the war and the anniversary of the sinking of the Lusitania.

This editorial by Frank J. Simonds appeared in the New York Tribune on the first anniversary of the torpedoing of the Lusitania cruise liner. Read the entire editorial and see if it reminds you of anything nowadays. Could you not have substituted the words “Islamic extremist” for “German” and “Germany” in this editorial and published it, almost unchanged except for a few references to contemporary events and specifics, on the tenth anniversary of 9/11?

“This war in Europe on terrorism is going on until the German the Islamic terrorist idea is crushed or conquers. The world cannot now exist half civilized and half German Islamic extremist. Only one of two conceptions of life, of humanity, can subsist. One of the conceptions was written in the Lusitania 9/11 Massacre, written clear beyond all mistaking. It is this writing that we should study on this anniversary; it is this fact that we should grasp today, not in anger, not in any spirit that clamors for vengeance, but as the citizens of a nation which has inherited noble ideals and gallant traditions, which has inherited liberty and light from those who died to serve them, and now stands face to face with that which seeks to extinguish both throughout the world.”

Wednesday’s Word of the Week: Snollygoster

Snollygoster: Popularized in the 1890s by H.J.W. Ham, a Georgia Democrat, a snollygoster is someone who wants political office at any cost — regardless of principles or platform. It’s possible the word came from the German phrase schnelle geister, which means quick spirit.

Maggie Galehouse at Bookish included this word in her post about the book Slinging Mud by Rosemarie Ostler.

'Michelle Bachman speaking.' photo (c) 2011, Mark Taylor - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/There’s a tendency these days to assume that all politicians are snollygosters–at least to some extent. All candidates for political office are corrupted, and every word they say, every action they take is calculated for effect and to get votes. So you get statements like this one from The Daily Beast about Michele Bachman:

“On Monday, Bachmann didn’t talk a lot about her religion. She didn’t have to—she knows how to signal it in ways that go right over secular heads.”

She’s a snollygoster, using her Christianity, covertly, to get votes. Kinda like a Christian fanatic undercover secret agent gal. Or maybe that’s Sarah Palin.

President Obama is accused of “pandering” to get votes–to the black community, to the gay community, to feminists, to Hollywood, to almost any group he even acknowledges or speaks to. He’s just a snollygoster who wanted to be president no matter what he had to say or do to get there.

'Rick Perry' photo (c) 2011, Gage Skidmore - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/Or Mitt Romney is a snollygoster because he changed his position from pro-choice to pro-life.

Rick Perry is a snollygoster who stays as quiet as possible and enters the race as late as possible so that he doesn’t say anything that will get him NOT elected.

If they’re all snollygosters with no fixed principles and no core character, what’s a citizen voter to do? I think we’ve become way too cynical. Maybe Rick Perry is trying to be thoughtful, not evasive. Maybe Mitt Romany truly changed his mind about abortion. Maybe Obama believes in gay rights and truly wants to help the black community, and he’s doing the best job he knows how to do as president. Maybe Michele Bachman quotes the Bible because she gets her ideas and core principles from Scripture, and she’s not trying to send secret coded messages to the Christians while retaining the secular conservative vote.

And maybe I’m naive and credulous. But it’s a lot easier to assume the politicians are telling the truth about what they believe and about what they want to accomplish, and then I can decide on the basis of what they say they believe which one best fits my values and political philosophy. And if you’re a snollygoster, well, the truth will out. You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.