Archives

Dani Noir by Nova Ben Suma

Film noir: genre of film, originally between 1940 and 1960, originating in the United States, employing heavy shadows and patterns of darkness, in which the protagonist dies, meets defeat, or achieves meaningless victory in the end.
A film/movie characterized by low-key lighting, a bleak urban setting, and corrupt, cynical or desperate characters.
Dark film, a term applied by French critics to a type of American film, usually in the detective or thriller genres, with low-key lighting and a somber mood.

Danielle, aka Dani, is a big fan of film noir. She’s especially fascinated with femme fatale actress Rita Hayworth. And it’s good for Dani that she has something like old movies to think about and a place like Little Art movie theater to go to, because the rest of her life . . . well, as Dani herself observes, “If this were a movie, I would’ve walked out by now. . . . Kick the slimy dregs of popcorn under the seat and head home.”

I loved reading this book. Dani is a self-centered, thirteen year old brat in some ways, but I didn’t get annoyed with her the same way I do with some bratty characters either in books or in real life. Maybe I felt as if Dani was trying to deal with the difficulties in her life in the only way she knew how. She’s not very kind to her dad, but then again he’s just recently left Dani’s mom and moved in with his girlfriend, Cheryl, in a house on the other side of the river. And Dani isn’t very patient with Austin, the guy who works at the movie theater, but he really is sort of annoying. Also Dani doesn’t obey her mom and she lies to her mom and she is determined to get her own way, but Dani’s motives are pure, or at least sort of pure: she’s trying to help a friend and right an injustice.

Unfortunately, just like in a noir movies, there are a lot of shadows and grey areas and lies and imperfection in Dani’s life. And in the end movies are just movies and reality is something else, something that keeps going and doesn’t end, not with a gunshot nor with a kiss. But movies do help Dani, as she says:

“Movies can do that: make people forget everything that’s bad about their lives, and bad about the world, even make them ignore the fact that they’ve already run out of popcorn. All that matters is what’s on-screen, that world in black-and-white or bright color, the story that’s got its hold on you. Movies really can make it better.

If this were a movie and the sun was going down on Shanosha, the femme fatale would have the last laugh, of course, walking off into the sunset with all her secrets.”

Great book. It made me want to go watch all of the films mentioned in the book: Notorious (with my favorite, Cary Grant), The Lady From Shanghai (Rita Hayworth), Casablanca, The Big Sleep (Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart), and The Postman Always RIngs Twice (Lana Turner).

Dani Noir is a fairly typical middle grade divorce story, but it’s enlivened by the noir atmosphere and the references to film and film history and by Dani’s voice which is snarky and vulnerable at the same time, like a femme fatale. Read it if it sounds like your kind of story, and in the meantime I have two questions for you to answer in the comments.

1. What is your favorite film noir?

2. What is your favorite comfort movie? What do you watch when you want to forget about your problems and get lost in movie world?

Amazon Affiliate. If you click on a book cover here to go to Amazon and buy something, I receive a very small percentage of the purchase price.
One or more of these books is also nominated for a Cybil Award, but the views expressed here are strictly my own.

Quick Movie Notes

Inspired by At a Hen’s Pace:

Sweet Land was recommended to me by someone, a blogger I think. It was a sweet little movie, set in 1920, in rural Minnesota, about a mail-order bride and her life and difficulties in the U.S. Since Inge is German, and the community she comes to join is mostly Norwegian, and since the U.S. has been recently at war with Germany, the difficulties are many. The kids found it somewhat confusing, but not inappropriate. Elizabeth Reaser who plays Inge is a beautiful and talented actress.

Amazing Grace is the story of William Wilberforce and the abolition of the slave trade in England. I saw it when it first came out in theaters, but Blockbuster offered me a coupon for a free movie, not a rental, but a previously viewed movie to own. I chose Amazing Grace, and tonight we watched it again. I found it not only educational, but moving and romantic and inspirational.

Computer Guru Son and I watched the movie Frequency the other night, and both of us found it stretched our ability to suspend disbelief past the breaking point. And I’m pretty good at “six impossible things before breakfast.” The most interesting thing about the movie, for LOST fans, is that one of the main characters is played by actress Elizabeth Mitchell who plays Juliet in LOST, and that the main character is named Jack Shepherd. Also, the movie is about time travel, or at least communication through time. Coincidence or is there some connection between this movie and the writers on LOST?

Speaking of movies, here’s a list from Inside Catholic of 50 Best Catholic Movies of All Time. I found it useful.

The End of the Alphabet, Wit, and John Donne

On a Friday night in February (during my blog break) while my ten year old daughter, Betsy-Bee was celebrating her birthday with a bevy of giggling friends in the living room watching Princess Diaries II, I watched the movie Wit in my bedroom, mostly alone. Wit tells the story of a forty-something college English professor, a specialist in the poetry of John Donne, who is told that she has stage-4 ovarian cancer. As Professor VIvian Bearing tells us later, in an aside, there is no stage-5.

Much of the movie, based on a play by Margaret Edson, is made up of the monologue narration of Ms. Bearing, as she tells the viewer of the indignities, pain and suffering that make up her journey through chemotherapy and cancer and eventually into death. As you can imagine, there are many poignant asides and scenes that are quite difficult to watch. Actress Emma Thompson plays the part of Vivian Bearing, and she is amazing. Engineer Husband saw pieces of the movie as he came in and out of our room, and he said she deserved an Academy Award. I agree.

The movie itself, especially Ms. Thompson’s performance, which really was the movie, was morbidly fascinating and difficult to watch. The way that Ms. Bearing interacted with the poetry of John Donne in her struggle with death and dying made the movie a rich and thoughtful experience. It’s rated PG-13 for “thematic elements”, and I would agree that it’s not for the young and/or faint of heart.

DEATH be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadfull, for, thou art not so,
For, those, whom thou think’st, thou dost overthrow,
Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleepe, which but thy pictures bee,
Much pleasure, then from thee, much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee doe goe,
Rest of their bones, and soules deliverie.
Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poyson, warre, and sicknesse dwell,
And poppie, or charmes can make us sleepe as well,
And better then thy stroake; why swell’st thou then;
One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally,
And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die.
~John Donne, 1572-1631

After I watched the movie and put the birthday partiers to sleep with threats and charms and poppies, I picked up a small book from my library basket, a novella really, The End of the Alphabet by C.S. Richardson. Coincidentally, serendipitously, it was a book about death and dying. Ambrose Zephyr, the protagonist of the novella, is told that he has a rare and incurable illness and only one month to live, “give or take a day.”As she was dying, Professor Bearing travelled through examination rooms, and hospital waiting areas, and X-rays and chemotherapy; Ambrose Zephyr decides to go on a literal journey, along with his wife, Zappora Ashkinazi, to an alphabetical list of meaningful places.

A is for Amsterdam.
B is for Berlin.
C is for Chartres, etc.

As the couple visit each place, Ambrose becomes more ill, more distant and withdrawn, and more desperate. Zappora, nicknamed Zipper, tries to travel with her husband on his dying journey, but it’s not something easily shared.

Ambrose: “So what? So there it is. Here I am. There’s nothing to deal with. If there were I would do it. But there isn’t and I am terrified and this isn’t happening to you.”
Zipper: “You selfish, silent, sh—, bastard. This is happening to me.”
Ambrose: “Really? In less than a month, you’ll still be alive.”
Zipper: “Really. I can hardly wait. Lying in on Sundays? At last. A decent cup of tea? Brilliant. No more squinting, no more imagination, no more silence? I can hardly f— wait.”

Zipper Ashkenazi and Ambrose Zephyr believe in each other, in communication and shared experience and in love. Zipper is left in the end with silence and her own words echoing off the pages of her journal, “This story is unlikely.” In fact, death is the most likely story of all. It is appointed unto man once to die, and after that the judgement.

Dr. Vivian Bearing believes in her own strength and stoicism, and when that is stripped away from her by her illness, she is left with the poetry of John Donne. She clings, not to God himself, but to Donne’s faith in God, and finally Donne’s conceits and paradoxes are empty for her, too. Her elderly mentor reads to her, not Donne, but rather the elegantly simple picture book, The Runaway Bunny by Margaret Wise Brown. I wonder if one can commit one’s soul to God mediated through the words of a picture book and a seventeenth century poet?

That question brings me back full circle to Donne, and ultimately to God.

“We have a winding-sheet in our mother’s womb which grows with us from our mother’s conception and we come into the world wound up in that winding-sheet, for we come to seek a grave.”
~John Donne’s sermon, Death’s Duel

Dr. Bearing died trusting, perhaps, in the God of Donne and of the Runaway Bunny. Ambrose Zephyr died at home in bed with his wife nearby, their final separation leading only to an “unlikely story.” How will I die? How will you?

“Our critical day is not the very day of our death, but the whole course of our life . . . God doth not say, Live well, and thou shalt die well, that is, an easy, a quiet death; but live well here, and thou shalt live well forever.”
~ Death’s Duel by John Donne.

I may die laughing or crying or screaming, with a bang or a whimper, but into His hands I commit my spirit. And I believe it to be highly likely that “He is able to keep that which I’ve committed unto Him against that day.”

Sir Thomas Becket: A Book and a Movie

“Thomas Becket (1118 – 29 December 1170) was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1162 to his death. He is venerated as a saint and martyr by both the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion. He engaged in conflict with Henry II of England over the rights and privileges of the Church and was assassinated by followers of the king in Canterbury Cathedral.” ~Wikipedia

Book: Time and Chance by Sharon Kay Penman.
Movie: Becket, starring Richard Burton and Peter O’Toole.


Reading the book and watching the movie made me want to re-read T.S. Eliot’s play, Murder in the Cathedral, but I haven’t gotten around to doing so.

In the movie Richard Burton’s Becket plays the hero to Peter O’Toole’s rather weak and whiny Henry II. Becket is the wiser, more compassionate, morally conflicted, but eventually winning through his weaknesses into sainthood.

In Penman’s book, Becket is more sanctimonious and unpredictable, nearly fanatical; Penman, through one of her characters, calls Becket a “chameleon” who takes on the coloring of his surroundings. Becket is not a hero in Time and Chance, but rather a man made nearly mad by power and responsibility.

I rather think that neither playwright Jean Anouilh, who wrote the play that was the source for the movie’s screenplay, nor Sharon Kay Penman, who based her portrayal on historical incidents of Becket’s inconsistencies and seeming contradictions, got Becket quite right. Anouilh makes hm out to be modern existential hero. Says Becket in the movie: “Honor is a private matter within; it’s an idea and every man has his own version of it.”

Penman makes him into a power-hungry religious fanatic who drives the worldly and pragmatic Henry near the brink of insanity. Penman’s Becket is practically suicidal, knowing that his words and actions will bring the wrath of the king to bear upon him and perhaps get him killed. But this Becket is more interested in besting Henry in their petty feud than in the health of the Church or even his own health and long life.

I prefer to think that Becket was converted at some point from worldliness and politics to the love of Christ and His Church. Maybe he just did what he thought was right and suffered the consequences.

I’d like to read Ken Follett’s Pillars of the Earth, which according to Wikipedia again ends with Becket’s death at the hands of Henry’s henchmen. I’ve heard good things about the 900 page tome, but it’s 900 pages and an Oprah pick. I’ll probably try it anyway. The Penman book is long, too, but worth it.

Friday Night at the Cinema: All About Eve

We watched All About Eve, a 1950 movie with Bette Davis, Anne Baxter, Celeste Holm, Gary Merrill, and Hugh Marlowe. Brown Bear Daughter said it was “the creepiest movie ever, except for Signs and The Village.” Anne Baxter plays what we nowadays would call a stalker; she idolizes actress Margo Channing (Bette Davis). Ms. Channing is a great actress, but has her own insecurities and character flaws, to say the least. Eve (Anne Baxter) plays off those insecurities masterfully and acts as diabolically as any backroom politician or criminal mastermind.

If you’re in the mood for wickedly entertaining, I’d recommend All About Eve. As a study in idolatry, it’s superb.

According to Internet Movie Database:

In real life, Bette Davis had just turned 42 as she undertook the role of Margo Channing, and Anne Baxter, still an up-and-comer, not only wowed audiences with her performance, but successfully pressured the powers that be to get her nominated for an Oscar in the Best Actress category rather than Best Supporting Actress. This is thought to have split the vote between herself and Davis. The winner for the 1950 Best Actress was Judy Holliday for her noticeable turn in Born Yesterday (1950), so Baxter’s actions in effect blocked Davis’ chances for the win.

The dialog in the movie is remarkable, like a play since it’s from a different era and it takes place in the world of the New York theatre. Here are some quotes. And here’s my favorite scene:

Semicolon’s September: Celebrations, Links and Birthdays

Random Movie Blog-a-Thon

This sounds like fun. Buy or rent a movie that you wouldn’t normally be interested in watching. Watch and then write a review. From the originator of the idea at Cinexcellence:

This doesn’t mean that it has to be one that you would probably hate. It could be one of those DVDs that you walk by all the time but never took a chance on it. But it could be one that you hate. . . . hey, we might discover some hidden gems along the way.

I think I’ll try this out. Something rated PG or G that nevertheless sounds stupid.

The Sunday Salon: Ruminating and Rambling

The Sunday Salon.com

I just joined Sunday Salon this week, and I’m planning to use it as an opportunity to think about what I’ve been reading and watching and studying for the week, maybe figuring how my “media intake” has influenced my thoughts and decisions and what I might want to do in response to what God is teaching me.

I watched a couple of movies this week: Becoming Jane, the fictional story of author Jane Austen’s doomed courtship with an entangled and ultimately unavailable young man, and Finding Neverland, the somewhat fictionalized story of author James Barrie’s doomed and irresponsible courtship of a widow and mother of four boys. I’ve seen the second movie before, and I reviewed it here. I was not quite as disturbed by Finding Neverland this second time as I was the first; I had more hope that J.M. Barrie would do the right thing and grow up for the sake of his young friends. There is a theme that runs through both movies of taking responsibility, self-sacrifice, and romantic dreams being subordinated to duty. Those are not easy lessons to make palatable on film in this day and age of self-actualization, irresponsibility, and romantic delusion. So I applaud both movies for the attempt.

I’ve also finished Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry, and I find that I want think about that book a bit more before I write much about it. I started reading The Deadliest Monster: An Introduction to Worldviews by J.F. Baldwin, an examination of currently popular worldviews and a comparison of those philosophies to the Christian view of life. Baldwin uses Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein monster and R.L. Stevenson’s Mr. Hyde as icons of two opposing worldviews: Mr. Hyde represents the Christian idea of original (innnate) sin and the necessity of God’s grace for salvation, and Frankenstein’s monster typifies the belief that men are only monsters because of their environment and influences and can perfect (save) themselves by their own efforts and good works.

Baldwin reminded me that none of us is truly able to perfect or redeem ourselves, that our own hearts are deceptive, and that we are all sinners in need of the mercy of God. And I have need of such reminders since I ruefully saw myself in these words from the book:

“As we grow in our faith, the little light bulb comes on that says, ‘Hey, Christ really meant it when he called himself the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Christianity really is true, and the rest of the world really is deceived!’ And then, unfortunately, a prideful voice whispers, ‘Aren’t I perceptive to see that Christianity is true and that every other worldview is bankrupt? I am one smart monkey.’ If we listen to this whisper, we allow ourselves to be deceived into thinking that we somehow rescued ourselves by being clever enough to see the truth.”

AH, yes, clever me, saved by grace and smart enough to do God a favor by recognizing His favor! If only that miserable tax collector were like me!

God, forgive us our pride and help us to see ourselves for the monsters we are apart from Him.

Recent Movie Views

We watched Juno at the hospital the other night. It was an adequate distraction from continuing seizures of the muscle tremor variety, Dancer Daughter’s, not mine. Juno, the character, is definitely a distraction. She distracts an older guy from his marriage, distracts her parents from giving her a major lecture when she reveals that she’s pregnant, and distracts her boyfriend into falling in love with her all over again. She does all this distracting by being bold, brassy, and vulnerable all at the same time, a neat trick if you can pull it off. The movie is quite well-acted, and watch for the way the movie works on your sympathies, causing the viewer to change from sympathizing with one character to rooting for another with subtle revelations that make you feel as if you should have known all along who’s the good guy and who’s the idiot.

We also watched Sabrina, at home this time, the old version with Humphrey Bogart, William Holden, and Audrey Hepburn. Cheesy, and yet . . . Fickle Miss Audrey/Sabrina can’t make up her mind which brother she loves, and she’s not supposed to have either one since she’s the daughter of the chauffeur, and they’re the heirs to the family fortune. No one could possibly be as young and naive as Sabrina is at the beginning of the movie. And no one could gain so much sophistication from a couple of years at a French cooking school. Still, the unspoiled and restrained screenplay belongs to another era, and a better era, I think. Sabrina and her employer/love interest are alone at night in the boardroom, and not once do they even begin to unclothe. Could such a scene be filmed nowadays?

Teens now are still vulnerable and young and even naive. But wise-cracking Juno is the vulnerable teen of the twenty-first century, and all the Sabrinas are, if they still exist, relics. Probably homeschooled.

Last but not least, after reading all the many reviews and opinions, pro and con, I finally got a chance to see Prince Caspian this afternoon. Everything has been said, and better than I could, so all I can say is: I liked it. Very much. In fact, I like both the book and the movie. The movie is not quite as profound, leaving out some of the spiritual contents of the book, but the movie had its own charms and its own lessons. For instance, one learns from Prince Caspian’s actions that perhaps revenge is not so sweet and also not so honorable. And there’s are lessons that shine through in both book and movie: growing up is bittersweet, Aslan/God often (usually) acts in unexpected ways, follow what you know to be right even if no one else goes with you.

I thought the character of Trumpkin could have been a bit more well-developed. I liked Susan, the Warrior Queen, and I didn’t mind the kiss at the end at all. What with the preceding disclaimer that Susan was 1300 years older than Caspian, I thought the kiss was almost sisterly. Mr. Lewis, opinionated professor that he was, would probably have been unhappy over some of the changes made in the transition from book to movie. However, the author has already been released from this world and has released his stories to the world, and I am happy that the movie was made, that it turned out so well, and that Narnia now has many more Lovers of Narnia because of it.

More wise thoughts on Prince Caspian, the movie:

Amy Hall at Stand to Reason: “Here’s my main criticism: The filmmakers still don’t get Aslan. They’ve made him a character rather than the character. Because of certain changes here and there, he lost the authority he should have radiated and didn’t inspire the awe that Aslan should inspire.”

Phillip at Thinklings: Edmund Rocks.

Amy Letinsky: “Many battles are waged in the film, more than are written in the book, and a clear theme emerges: when you use Aslan’s strength, you win the fight. But when you rely on your own cleverness and strength alone, you’re destined to fail.”

Leave me a comment, and I’ll be happy to link to your review or thoughts on any of these three films.

Prince Caspian is Everywhere

I’m going to post this list and add to it as I read more reviews and related posts. I don’t know whether the movie is a winner or a clunker, but I’m happy to see St. Jack getting so much attention because I think all of his books are Excellent.

I’ll bet you didn’t realize that Prince Caspian is about beer.

In a sort of schizophrenic post, Betsy Bird discusses the book and the movie with a viewer and a reader, both herself.

The Narnia fans at The Common Room are forgiving . . . to a point. Then they just get mad.

Libertas has the exact opposite reaction: “The Christian theme is not only stronger in Caspian than in Wardrobe, but integrated more naturally into the story — slowly building with events until it perfectly climaxes at the end for maximum emotional effect. This is not some new-age Christian allegory where if you fall to your knees in some sun-dappled field and raise your hands to Jesus all your problems will go away. As in life, God is not a deus ex machina. There’s a bigger picture at work — a master plan — and it’s up to us to find our place within that plan, not the other way around. What Would Aslan Do? No. What Would Aslan Want Us To Do.”

Carissa Smith (Christ and Pop Culture) says the movie is about “putting away childish things.”

Barbara Nicolosi at Church of the Masses calls it a compentently executed fantasy movie with a lot of fighting, pleasant visuals, engaging actors, and a mediocre script. But she doesn’t like fantasy in the first place, so . . .

Ken Brown of C. Orthodoxy prepared himself to see the film version of Prince Caspian by . . . not re-reading the book. Perhaps that’s not a bad idea for those who want to enjoy/evaluate the movie on its own terms.

I haven’t seen the movie yet. No offense to the the Headmistress and crew, but I actually think I’m going to like it. A lot.

Winter Haven by Athol Dickson

I’m sorry to say that I didn’t think this book, the third novel I’ve read and enjoyed by Mr. Dickson, was as good as either River Rising (Semicolon review here) or The Cure (Semicolon review here). Of course, I put River Rising on my list of the Best Novels of All Time, and I’ve raved about it over and over. So, the pressure to live up to its predecessors was intense. The dialogue in this latest novel felt forced and stilted, and the plot reminded me of a Gothic romance: a dashing older man with a dilapidated mansion and secrets to keep, dark and eerie events and characters, hints of violence and horror in the past, the question of whether Mr. Tall, Dark, and Handsome can be trusted. Add in an insecure and frightened heroine and a madwoman, and it’s all been done before, better, in Jane Eyre or Rebecca. Your mileage may vary, but if you haven’t read River Rising, by all means, drop everything and hie thee to the nearest bookstore or library and grab a copy.

Still, I did like the setting of Winter Haven on an isolated island off the coast of Maine. What are the advantages of setting a novel (or play) on an island, particularly an island with limited or no access to the outside world. It’s like LOST. (Winter Haven has time issues and a polar bear, too—like LOST. No, I am not obsessed with LOST.)

In an island setting, you, the author, can limit your cast of characters, and you can make The Island a metaphor for the Earth itself or for a community. Or you can further isolate your protagonist by making him a castaway on a deserted island as in Robinson Crusoe or the Tom Hanks movie Castaway. What does solitude and the lack of relationship and human companionship do to a man, or a woman? How does he survive alone? Or you can have a group of castaways forced to associate and build a new society, for better or for worse: The Swiss Famiy Robinson (utopian) or Lord of the Flies (very dystopian).

Let’s build a list of island stories:

Books:

The Odyssey by Homer. (Odysseus travels from one island to another and gets trapped on Calypso’s island home.)
Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe.
Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift.
The Swiss Family Robinson by Johann Wyss.
The Tempest by William Shakespeare.
Lord of the Flies by William Golding.
Hawaii by James Michener.
Evil Under the Sun by Agatha Christie.
A Caribbean Mystery by Agatha Christie.
Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhyss.
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader by C.S. Lewis. (island-hopping)
The Island of Dr. Moreau by H.G. Wells.
Mysterious Island by Jules Verne.
Island of the Blue Dolphins by Scott O’Dell.
The Cay by Theodore Taylor.
Island by Aldous Huxley.
Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson.
Pitcairn’s Island by Charles Nordhoff and James Norman Hall. ( A sequel to Mutiny on the Bounty)

Film
Gilligan’s Island (TV series from my misspent youth)
Fantasy Island (ditto)
Key Largo
South Pacific
Cast Away
LOST (TV series from my misspent middle age)

Romesh Geneskera’s Top Ten Island Books

Anyone have additional suggestions in the category of Good Stories with Island Settings?